North Picene is an unclassified
language from Northeastern Italy, preserved on stelai fragments from
the 800-650 BCE period. A quick look at the best preserved
inscription, the Novilara Stele, suggests that the language might be
IndoEuropean. Other proposals have also been suggested, but this is
the one we're to look at today.
The Novilara Stele (6th
Century BCE)
- mimniś erút gaareśtadeś
- rotnem úvlin partenúś
- polem iśairon tet
- śút tratneši krúviś
- tenag trút ipiem rotneš
- lútúiś θalú iśperion vúl
- teś rotem teú aiten tašúr
- śoter merpon kalatne
- niś vilatoś paten arn
- úiś baleśtenag andś et
- šút iakút treten teletaú
- nem polem tišú śotriś eúś
For an image of this stele:
And according to this post in this
forum:
mimniś erút gaareśtadeś
rotneš úvlin parten úś
polem iśairon tet
šút tratneši krúš
tenag trút ipiem rotneš
lútúiś θalú iśperion vúl
teś rotem teú aiten tašúr
śoter merpon kalatne
niś vilatoś paten arn
úiś baleśtenag andś et
šút lakút treten teletaú
nem polem tišú śotriś eúś
possible alternative readings:
line 1: gaariśtadeś
line 2: partenúś
line 4: krúś
line 5: rotnem
line 8: merion
line 11: mút iakút
rotneš úvlin parten úś
polem iśairon tet
šút tratneši krúš
tenag trút ipiem rotneš
lútúiś θalú iśperion vúl
teś rotem teú aiten tašúr
śoter merpon kalatne
niś vilatoś paten arn
úiś baleśtenag andś et
šút lakút treten teletaú
nem polem tišú śotriś eúś
possible alternative readings:
line 1: gaariśtadeś
line 2: partenúś
line 4: krúś
line 5: rotnem
line 8: merion
line 11: mút iakút
And as for the other fragmentary texts,
also found in Novilara, according to that forum post:
2nd Stele (left half of two
lines)
úpeś
mresveat
mresveat
The ú in line 1 might also be an L.
In line 2 ve could also be ev or ee.
In line 2 ve could also be ev or ee.
3rd fragmentary text
pa śatigot
kešoteri
amdet : nk
------ k --------
kešoteri
amdet : nk
------ k --------
The p in line 1 is uncertain.
4th fragmentary text
tiperašθe raiup
bav---
-----ipš---------------------
-----ipš---------------------
I like how the user Arnth also added
sidenotes:
"There appears to be some flexion
at work: rotnem - rotneš, śoter - śotris.
Similarities to Greek words: polem - polis, śoter - soter, iśperion – esperios."
Similarities to Greek words: polem - polis, śoter - soter, iśperion – esperios."
I noticed this as well, and they're
(well at least some of them) transparently IndoEuropean! Though they
also note how the -sv- element is also found in North Etruscan, as
well as several other features also being possibly Etruscan (so it's
not a done deal what language family this belongs to).
Now that we've presented the evidence
of this language, let's start picking it apart, shall we?
No comments:
Post a Comment