What if PIndoEuropean Had Distinct Clusivity Pronouns?

What if ProtoIndoEuropean, or PreProtoIndoEuropean, had seperate pronouns for Inclusive and Exclusive 1st Person, dual and plural, personal pronouns?

If we were to lay out some of the reconstructions, for our example we'll use some enclitic pronouns from the Northwestern IndoEuropean branch for Illustration, it might look like this:

Potential Reconstruction of an Earlier System (Reconstruction and Hypothesis mine).

		Proto- Germanic	Common Baltic	Common Slavic	Western IndoEuropean
1st Sing.	Nom.			já	ja
	Acc.		men	mę	men
	Gen.	mī		mě	mē
	Poss.	mȳ		moj	moi
	Dat.	mē	mi	mi	mi
1st Incl. Dual	Nom.	wi	vě	vě	wē
	Acc.		vū	wy	wū
	Gen.
	Poss.
	Dat.			wa	wa
1st Excl. Dual	Nom.				nē
	Acc.			ny	nū
	Gen.
	Poss.
	Dat.			na	na
1st Incl. Plur.	Nom.				wos
	Acc.				wes
	Gen.
	Poss.
	Dat.
1st Excl. Plur.	Nom.				nos
	Acc.				nes
	Gen.
	Poss.
	Dat.				nas
2nd Sing.	Nom.	þū	tū	ty	tū
	Acc.		ten	tę	ten
	Gen.	þī		tě	tē
	Poss.	þȳ		toj	toi
	Dat.	þē	ti	ti	ti
2nd Dual	Nom.	ġi			jē
	Acc.		jū		jū
	Gen.
	Poss.
	Dat.				ja
2nd Plur.	Nom.				jos
	Acc.				jes
	Gen.
	Poss.
	Dat.				jas
3rd Sing.	Nom.			sy	sū
	Acc.		sen	sę	sen
	Gen.	sī		sě	sē
	Poss.	se	si	si	soi
	Dat.				si
3rd Dual	Nom.				sē
	Acc.			sy	sū
	Gen.
	Poss.
	Dat.			sa	sa
3rd Plur.	Nom.				sē
	Acc.			sy	sū
	Gen.
	Poss.
	Dat.			sa	sa

*At least in some cases, ū is actually reconstructed as ō in Northwest IndoEuropean, but this distinction isn't such that it would have an impact upon the correlations noted above. (And in the case of my own speculative chart specifically, nearly all of them are reconstructible as /ō/)

*plural forms jos reconstructible as jūs/jōs; And may well derive from an adjectival form of this pronoun. Adjectival forms has -w- between the root and the vowel ending.

Any thoughts? Opposing? In favor? Uncertain?